To Save Or Not Save the World

Lately I have been living with great guilt for bringing children into this world. I know what is just around the corner, and I know what they'll be facing. My natural reaction is to try and do something about it, but what? There are dozens of organizations who are addressing the world's problems from many different angles. My goal is to find a volunteer movement that will have the most effective results for my limited volunteer time. But what?

When I first got back into environmentalism in 1997 I decided that the most important issue was global overpopulation, and I STILL think it's a top issue. I spent hundreds of hours creating a local population group, marching in parades, tabling at events, organizing forums, and giving presentations. Ultimately, I think I accomplished a little, but not much.

My fellow activists said I should "Think Global, But Act Local," so I got involved in a wide range of issues ranging from urban sprawl to stream buffer protection. I also worked in the campaigns of green politicians and organized against the bad politicians. On the county level, I did enjoy fair success knocking out developer puppets on county commissions and replacing them with greenies. But, eventually, those green politicians either moved on or were corrupted.

By 2003 I realized that overpopulation and global warming were simply symptoms of some global inner struggle. Our technology seems to have advanced faster than our maturity as a species.

The Logical Song

At age 50, my main conclusion is that humans in general are simply far less intelligent than I ever imagined. People are simply dumb, especially those who smoke. Humans are also petty, self-centered, disconnected, and most are incapable of critical thinking.

Being the hopelessly logical person that I am, I thought we could just say, "Here's a problem, now let's all work together to fix it." In fact, when I was working on overpopulation I felt that I could present a sensible argument and that people would say, "Yeah, you're right, let's fix that."

But the push back I see with any new idea or progressive proposal is simply incredible. For instance, with global warming, much of the general public simply doesn't care or is too stupid to know better, and then the handful of smarter ones simply deny it. Working behind the scenes are powerful special interest groups, with tons of money, who strongly influence the media, and would prefer that things remain "as is."

Cycles

I am now thinking that civilization simply operates in cycles, and there is NOTHING I can do to prevent our impending economic and ecological collapse. Great civilizations have died before, and we've certainly experienced the Dark Ages before. Thus, history is repeating itself and we are about to go through it all again. Who am I to resist?

The human dieoff part will be the worst. The abundance of cheap petroleum is supporting an artificially large population. When fuel becomes scarce, the population will shrink back to sustainable levels. Nature will do the job that we "smart" humans are incapable of doing ourselves. Unfortunately, the "adjustment" will not be pleasant. On top of everything else, I'm sure we can expect to see some all-out desperate wars.

New Beginnings

Colleagues tell me that nature always recovers from the havoc caused by humans. Some of the richest ecological areas are places where humans are not allowed, such as the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea, or the land that's cordoned off around Chernobyl. I'm not sure of that at all -- it is completely possible for us to do irreparable harm to the planet.

But, you know, I'm now thinking that's okay. In the vastness of the Universe, with its trillions of stars, I'm betting that there is a handful of other Earth-like planets. My hope is that if some intelligent species ever evolves on them, that they will treat their planet better than we treated ours.

Capitalism Mythology

Yesterday after our Thanksgiving feast, I enjoyed a nice talk with my father-in-law about capitalism.

He was offended when I said that capitalism is unsustainable. He felt I was attacking free enterprise, and assumed I was advocating socialism instead. He said that there is nothing wrong with someone becoming wealthy through hard work. He said there is not a single country where socialism has succeeded, and that the incentive of profit is needed to motivate people.

I pointed out to him that with unfettered capitalism, the money simply rises to the top. I said that when 5% of the world's population control 40% of the world's wealth, there is a problem. And when you are rich, it's easier to accumulate more wealth. I also pointed out that the middle class are becoming the lower class, and can't afford to buy all the crap that made the rich people rich in the first place. Thus, we have the sinkhole in which capitalism collapses.

I finished the conversation by saying the solution is not socialism, but socially responsible capitalism. On the way home, I realized that this is a fallacy as well. Only government can control capitalism, and that means a larger and more intrusive government. Since the government seems to screw up nearly everything it does, I doubt that they could properly reign in capitalism, which tends to treat humans as a commodity rather than people.

So, I guess the only solution is that capitalists should self-regulate. They must adopt the attitude of not just focusing on the bottom line, but also being environmentally and socially responsible, and, most importantly, remembering that they should also try to provide some decent paying jobs for American citizens. Hey, there is an advantage to that. If you outsource ALL the jobs, there won't be anyone to buy your product.

I don't think most people are intentionally greedy, but the system we operate in IS inherently greedy. There is pressure at all levels of a corporation to turn a good quarterly profit, which increases stock value, and, in turn, means more bonuses and dividends.

I am not sure that sustainable capitalism will EVER work. But, anyway, I digress. Here is a quote from columnist and blogger Chris Hedges:

It is not accidental that the economic crisis will converge with the environmental crisis. In his book The Great Transformation (1944), Karl Polanyi laid out the devastating consequences the depressions, wars and totalitarianism that grow out of a so-called self-regulated free market. He grasped that "fascism, like socialism, was rooted in a market society that refused to function." He warned that a financial system always devolves, without heavy government control, into a Mafia capitalism and a Mafia political system which is a good description of our financial and political structure. "A self-regulating market", Polanyi wrote, "turns human beings and the natural environment into commodities, a situation that ensures the destruction of both society and the natural environment". The free market's assumption that nature and human beings are objects whose worth is determined by the market allows each to be exploited for profit until exhaustion or collapse. A society that no longer recognizes that nature and human life have a sacred dimension, an intrinsic value beyond monetary value, commits collective suicide. Such societies cannibalize themselves until they die. This is what we are undergoing.

Polanyi is insistent that "laissez-faire was planned; planning was not." He explicitly attacks market liberals who blamed a "collectivist conspiracy" for erecting protective barriers against the working of global markets. He argues, instead, that this creation of barriers was a spontaneous and unplanned response by all groups in society against the impossible pressures of a self-regulating market system. The protective countermovement had to happen to prevent the disaster of a disembedded economy. Polanyi suggests that movement toward a laissez-faire economy needs the countermovement to create stability. When, for example, the movement for laissez-faire is too powerful, as in the 1920s (or the 1990s) in the United States, speculative excesses and growing inequality destroy the foundations for continuing prosperity. And although Polanyi's sympathies are generally with the protective countermovement, he also recognizes that it can sometimes create a dangerous political-economic stalemate. His analysis of the rise of fascism in Europe acknowledges that when neither movement was able to impose its solution to the crisis, tensions increased until fascism gained the strength to seize power and break with both laissez-faire and democracy.

Industrial Collapse

Photo credit: KWAB

It is Thanksgiving morning, 2010. As I sit on my bed writing this entry I ponder over the collapse of the Industrial Age.

Two cats are keeping my feet warm at the foot of the bed. My wife is in the kitchen making a yummy side dish for our Thanksgiving feast. Life is good.

Garbage
Yes, count me in for some of that liberal guilt. I'll take a round, baby. A waste management engineer once told me that landfills are made in giant bowls, with some sort of lining. When they are full, they are vented, covered with dirt, and all that fast food plastic has a 1,000 years to decay. The waste from the Happy Meals I bought my children 15 years ago are now rotting in some landfill. Tons of methane is rising from the heated pile of crap. Some of this methane is piped and used for "green" energy, but most goes into the atmosphere, where it becomes the worst type of global warming gas.

So, think for a moment, if it takes 1,000 years for all the landfill crap to decay, just how many more landfills will we need in 1,000 years? If we continue at our current pace, there will be hundreds of capped landfills all over the place, emitting tons of methane gas. Is this sustainable?

Chemicals
The average person uses dozens of chemicals, all designed for one purpose -- to make us happy. Some chemicals make us feel better while others make us look better. Much of this crap either ends up in a septic tank or in a sewage system. Since the Industrial Age began, we've created several thousand chemicals, and we don't know exactly how they interact with one another, or how they affect our health and environment over the long-term. Most of the chemicals we buy have long names that we can't even pronounce, yet we have no problem pouring the shit down the drain.

Air/Water Pollution
From cigarette smokers to nasty factories, we are belching tons of crap into our oceans, rivers, lakes, and air. Again, we don't know how all of the waste products interact with one another, and we don't know exactly what are are doing to our long-term health. Again, all this crap is emitted for a single purpose -- to make us happy, and to make our lives more comfortable.

So....
Excuse me, but am I the only one missing the insanity of our situation? We are poisoning the Planet and jeopardizing our health, and the health of all living creatures, just so that WE CAN HAVE SHORT TERM COMFORT. Is that absolutely stupid or what?

The Way We Am
Admittedly, not much has changed since the 1950s. If you look around, you just see people doing what they've ALWAYS done, and what their parents did. No one gives a second thought about jumping into their massive SUV, idling 10 minutes in a McDonald's drive-thru, and then rotting their insides out with a McNasty burger. Why? Because everyone is doing it, and it's ALWAYS been done that way.

Conservative Backlash
Right now we have the Tea Party and other conservative groups rabidly screaming that they DON'T WANT CHANGE. They say they want to get back to the "old ways," and then they start rambling about value concepts, like family, God, and country. They want to be comforted with their illusions as they cuddle by the fireplace with Sarah Palin's latest book. Their delusional values give them comfort, while their Prozac infested poop is flushed into the water system and absorbed by some innocent fish. And, it's for the better because now the fish is no longer depressed about the fouling of its water. And meanwhile, church people hold hands around a bond fire, sing songs, and discuss how Glenn Beck is still their leader, even though he's a Mormon.

Selfish Gene
I half think that people AREN'T inherently selfish. It's just that we have to be selfish because everyone else is selfish. We all have to fight for our own survival. This creates a vicious circle where everyone has to be more selfish to out-compete other selfish people. In the end, our health, environment, sanity, and the well-being of other wildlife are forgotten. But the important thing is that we have tons of chemicals in our bathroom cabinet to make us smell better, look better, and, ultimately, feel better. And, meanwhile, our society collapses under the weight of our own indifference.

Spitting Out the Kool-Aid

I feel different and isolated from most people in the world. I feel like a loner. When I'm with my mother and siblings, it always feels awkward. Long ago I threw out the mythological dogma that enslaved me, and they don't understand why.

My mother, especially, is a ravenous defender of the status quo. She is the greatest prisoner I know to her own indoctrination. She feels that society should return to the 1950s, which was the perfect, idyllic time for her. Any kind of reasoning with her is dismissed. If it's not the Devil behind our global problems, then it's "worldly" and "immoral" people in general who are causing our downfall.

Moving On

If humanity continues its current course, we will soon destroy ourselves both environmentally and economically. There are many debates on the true source of this problem, and some people point to "greed" and "selfishness." Others point out the lack of "critical thinking" in our society, and still others say we need to "mature" more as a species. Well, I think all the above are correct.

Solving the Problem

What can I do as just one of nearly 7 billion humans? The biggest problem is my inability to crack the walls that people have built around themselves. They have all drank the red Kool-Aid of consumerism, God, guns, and country, and they have mixed all of this together to create a bizarre set of values that have nothing to do with our need to survive.

Environmentalists are branded "extreme" and "radical," which certainly is easier than dealing with any problem. If someone starts talking about our environmental ills, they are simply considered "liberals," and the masses of sheep move on with their meaningless, empty, and self-destructive lives.

I can't awaken them, nor can I get them to see that their minds are filled with lies, propagated by those who benefit from the status quo. The myth that the United States is always "good," that there is some deity in the sky that micro-manages our lives, and that buying things helps the economy are all LIES that are drilled into our heads. Yet, people rarely challenge them.

How Do I React?

Am I depressed? Hell yeah, I'm depressed. There are times when I don't want to do anything except sleep. The stupidity of the last election was depressing, Fox News is depressing, the Tea Party is depressing. Americans appear to have sunk to a new low in their insanity, which I guess is a coping mechanism. And as the world gets more screwed up, by their own ignorant indifference, then the masses of sheep will become even more disconnected, disoriented, and generally crazy. Will there be violence? Yes, eventually.

Positive Notes

There are a couple of signs that are positive:

• More women in politics. I was thrilled to see so many female candidates in the mid-term elections. This gives me hope. Total equality for women is, in my opinion, crucial for sustainability. As more women enter the political arena, I can't help but believe they will insert more reason and concern for the environment into our government. They are the mothers who are bringing children into this screwed up world, so I really think that they will insert a sensitivity that few males would ever have.
  
  
• Church membership in decline. Now, here is the really exciting news -- when you Google "declining membership" you will see a long list of articles on how most Christian denominations are losing members by the droves. This is a good thing because Christianity is completely disconnected from the environment and our need to survive (they only teach you illusions). Now, Christianity teaches many good things, like the Golden Rule, but as soon as the sheep leave the church and pack out the restaurants, all the good things are promptly ignored. So, really, I see little use for organized religion. Worse yet, religion is the antithesis for critical thinking. Church is a place where asking tough questions makes you "sacrilegious" or a "heretic." The idea is that if you ask a tough question about the Holy Bible you are "questioning God," which, apparently, pisses him off. Or, more likely, people can't stand the idea that the mythology they've invested their lives into is an illusion. There is a LOT of emotionalism involved. People get defensive not because you are questioning God, but because you are questioning THEIR BELIEF.

In Conclusion

Okay, while I stay depressed a lot because of our species suicide, these past few years have also been the best years of my life, mainly due to some special people I've become friends with. These individuals have opened my eyes and given me more pieces to the puzzle of life. For the past few years, I've felt that the puzzle is almost complete, and I'm wondering if I've hit the last wall, or if there are more doors to open. I feel like I have a grasp on our current challenge, so I guess the next step is to take action. But I haven't figured out how yet. The best I can do is to put little cracks into people's sacred belief systems. When they see my thinking does not conform to their rigid worldview, they do try to ostracize me. I had one high school classmate who recently "defriended" me on Facebook, and my mother uses the tactic of making me feel like a "bad person" for not conforming to the institutional status quo. But, all in all, the best form of punishment for my nonconformism is to simply isolate me, and that's one area where "the world" has done a pretty good job. For the most part, I am all alone. Even my own wife and children have drank the societal Kool-Aid and have savored every last drop.

And what's really odd is that people who are indoctrinated call ME indoctrinated. So, maybe I am indoctrinated by the liberal elite, and I just don't know it. But the difference between me and the sheep is that I question EVERYTHING and don't accept any kind of pre-packaged dogma. So, maybe I'm just indoctrinated at a different level. Maybe, but I doubt it.

Trapped In A Box

I try to explain to people all the time how we are "trapped in a box." It's hard for me to verbalize it. Even some of my seasoned environmentalist colleagues don't understand. The best way to understand is to read the book Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, which is the best book I ever read.

I've also become a big fan of movie producer Peter Joseph, who has become my new hero. I don't agree with everything he says, but the dude definitely "gets it."

Here is a fascinating quote that he gave during an interview:

Anyone who chooses to challenge establishment orthodoxy; traditional world views, not to mention the system we live in, sets themselves up for venomous attacks. I am well aware of this.

If you look back at the history of anyone who has chosen to challenge the establishment it’s a very dark history. There are a great number of people out there that know something is wrong. But, they do not understand the source of that wrongness because they are “in the box” of indoctrination.

Socrates never speculated on the slavery that was existing during his time; that was normality to him. This goes with every type of political philosopher that’s ever existed, whether it is Karl Marx, whether it’s Plato; they’re all locked into an established paradigm and their thought processes can only go so far; and this probably includes myself.

People are locked into a box. They see the box around them; they see the leaks, the holes, and the cracks. And they go up to the cracks and try to fix them; they try to patch the holes. But they don’t stop to think that maybe there’s something wrong with the box itself. Maybe the integrity of the box that they exist, live in, is inherently invalid, it’s inherently void.

The economic system that we live in is a parasitic paradigm that is only going to lead to self destruction, but people don’t see that. So, if you attack the economic system for what it actually is, everyone’s feathers go up.

Everyone says, “Well, wait a minute. This is the world we all live. We live in a profit based, labor for income world, cyclical consumption; this is what we’re used to. We understand we have division of classes.” They throw in human nature, they throw in everything that will try and make it seem like it’s a part of the natural order of reality, when in fact it is not.

Wow! I have regularly advertised his Zeitgeist movies, and I strongly recommend that them to everyone. Below is an excerpt from Zeitgeist: Addendum, which discusses religious thinking. It has really been on my mind today.

Feeding Lemmings

This morning I had an epiphany! The economy didn't crash because of poor regulation. Rather, it crashed because bankers were running out of people to loan their cheap money to. After a while, they got less picky and started giving mortgage loans to virtually anyone.

But it wasn't their fault! This was necessary to keep the economic engine alive. The banks had to find a place to funnel all that Federal Reserve money, and property was the ideal investment. And with all those dollars chasing property, real estate went up, meaning more equity for home owners, less riskier investments for banks, and more tax revenue for state and local governments. What a grant deal it was for EVERYONE.

Until it all collapsed ...

And it simply collapsed because the banks ran out of credit-worthy people to give cheap loans to.

The Sham

The Federal Reserve is a criminal organization that generates quick wealth and then passes on the debt to our children. This wealth is created by buying securities from big banks and giving them cash to loan.

In a carefully planned racket, the banks then loan out the money to consumers and companies, which results in short-term business expansion and job creation.

But who is paying for this cheap money? YOU ARE!!! That's because every time the Fed dumps money into the economy, there is inflation. If you are a responsible person who saves money, the value of your savings shrinks due to intentional inflation. In effect, inflation is a tax that is imposed upon you. And in effect, you are subsidizing cheap mortgages and business loans. Do you think a bank could really afford to give a 3% loan without subsidization? HA! Your children and grandchildren will be paying the loan's true worth in the form of NATIONAL DEBT!

Debt is Evil

The Federal Reserve is a Ponzi scheme that can only work by accumulating more DEBT. As our government takes on more debt, that means more money is spent paying interest (usually to overseas investors) instead of going back into the economy.

If we had a balanced budget, I wouldn't mind paying taxes because every one dollar I gave to Uncle Sam would go back out into the economy. But right now, many of my dollars are going to CHINA!

Now, Uncle Sam is in a bad predicament, because he is one of the biggest customers in the economy, and if he is spending all his money on foreign interest payments instead of providing goods and services to the people, two bad things happen: 1) Social upheaval, and 2) Uncle Sam must borrow EVEN MORE money to keep the economy alive. As you can see, this creates a vicious downward circle.

Tea Party Wrath

Tea Party folks are pissed off, and I don't blame them. They know something bad is going on, but haven't figured out exactly what. Certainly, our last two presidents and Congress should be held accountable for the serious financial crimes they committed -- the bailouts and stimulus plan. But don't get so mad at them because they were under intense pressure from the banks to take action. This is really bad because instead of punishing Wall Street we rewarded them. The public was told that the bailouts were necessary to avoid a depression, which is just another of the many lies we are fed daily. The truth is that the bailouts ensured that the rich and powerful stayed, well, rich and powerful. And that is the entire point of the Federal Reserve System.

Environmentalists, Wake Up!

Environmentalists are a noble lot, but they are always chasing symptoms instead of addressing root causes. It is the Federal Reserve that has gunned the throttle and caused our economy to grow at an artificially rapid pace. All the cheap money for loan allowed developers to have a feeding frenzy on green space. The rapid growth polluted our air and water, and masses of human laborers were needed to work in the economy, and thus, mass immigration. As an environmentalist, the best thing you can do is work to dismantle the Federal Reserve.

Life Without the Fed

Without the Federal Reserve, life would be slower, but more sustainable. Loans would be hard to get and expensive (since they won't be subsidized by your children). This will force people and companies to live within their means. This means that individuals and businesses will actually have to save up for something before they buy it. Holy crap, this is the way people USED TO LIVE!

Alongside all this cheap loan money, we've created a culture of consumption. Everyone has to have everything, and they want it now. Cheap and plentiful credit is the cocaine that keeps everyone high and happy. But trust me, you really don't need all your crap. You really don't need to put Christmas shopping on your credit card. You really don't.

Inner Destruction

The Fed has done more than just destroy our economy -- they've also destroyed our souls. So many people now grab on to materialism to provide their "high" and short-term happiness. Few people save, and, hell, it doesn't make sense to save anyway since the Fed-induced inflation will eat it away. So, people live for the present, and on credit.

Summary

The two best things we can do for the economy is to balance the national budget and dump the Fed. This is only fair, since passing our debt to a future generation is both immoral and unethical. I'm surprised since parents will sacrifice greatly for their children to give them a comfortable life and education, but the crushing national debt is not on their radar screen.

Wake up, America!

The Trashcan Novel

All my life I've dreamed of becoming a writer. I wrote my first short story in the third grade. By age 11 I was writing regularly. I loved satire, and found it amusing when I got in trouble with my sixth grade teacher, Ms. Roache, who pulled me aside and lectured me about my "attitude." She was concerned about my suggestion of bombing China (it was SATIRE). Of course, it was hard to take serious someone who was named after a dirty insect.

Things got better in my junior high years, and I had teachers who took an interest in my writing and were extremely supportive. In those days they had a cool program called independent studies, which allowed you to create your own elective, provided that you had a sponsoring teacher. You would work in the teacher's classroom or in the library during their planning periods. I chose a creative writing program, and for two years I did nothing but write for an hour each day.

In the eighth grade I started my first novel, titled "War Without A Cause." The theme of the book is that this secret army was going to invade the world and make everything better. They were going to put an end to crime, hunger, corruption, and everything bad in the world. They eventually grew in numbers, invaded the Soviet Union, and, finally, the United States.

During my adolescent years, my writing slowed down because of my interest in girls. But I did take a creative writing class during my senior year of high school. Once again, the teacher took my satire literally and gave me a "C" in the course -- one of only a couple of C's I received all year. I didn't mind because I appreciated the fact that my teacher didn't "get it."

In college, I began writing furiously during the summers and Christmas breaks. I started a few more books, including my first attempt at sci-fi. I found that when I was depressed I did the most writing, and I went through a lot of emotional ups and downs during my college years.

I got married in 1983, and said, "now that I'm settling down, I can really focus on my writing." My wife allowed me to get a fancy, IBM Selectric typewriter, and in the evenings after work, I would go into our spare room and write. More books were started, but never finished. These included "The Battlefield Life" and "The Trashcan Novel."

"The Trashcan Novel" is one of my favorite works. It was inspired by a fellow staffer on my college newspaper. He was in love with another writer on the staff. When she gave him the "let's be friends" line he was crushed. One day he came into the newspaper office looking like a wreck. He said, "I spent the entire night writing a 50-page poem, and then I threw it in the trash." That struck me as being beautifully profound, and he became the main character in my book.

In the following years, I had two children and became involved in other things, like computer user groups. I didn't do much writing.

In 1993 I had some scary health problems and ended up in the hospital. I really thought that I was going to die. When I got out, I went into the attic and threw a large portion of my writings away. I felt that much of my work was depressing, and I never wanted my daughters to see them. Throwing these manuscripts away is something I deeply regret to this day.

In the 1990s, I continued my writing in the newsletters of groups I was involved with — my computer user group, church, and, later, my local Sierra Club newsletter. I particularly enjoyed writing and debating on environmental discussion lists. I regularly received compliments on my writing, and people appeared to particularly enjoy my rants.

I used my writing talents for the environmental cause, and got one op-ed and a handful of letters published in the local press. I also started creating websites and placing my essays online. In 2004, I started blogging.

Now, it's 2010 and I'm 50 years old. I still haven't written a single, completed book, although I have many ideas in my head. My dream and hope is that one day, before my life is over, I'll get to actually finish a book. Even if it's not published, it will be a great personal accomplishment that I will be very proud of. Maybe, just maybe, if I can ever find the time ....

The Goose

The New World

In the new world I envision there will be peace. Capitalism will live, but people will have a sense of working for the greater good.

Logic will prevail, and people will be rational. Religion will be put in its proper place, next to Santa Claus and Zeus.

There will be no borders, and people will move freely about the planet. Poverty will be eliminated because every nation will disband their military, and there will be more resources to assist all.

We will mature as a species, and learn tolerance and open-mindedness. We will learn to LISTEN to one another. We will learn sensitivity and compassion.

There won't be smokers, and people won't fling their cigarette butts and trash out their windows.

People will work together to keep our planet clean and green. We will respect the Earth and our fellow animal species.

We will learn to love one another, instead of being divisive. We will understand that we can accomplish more as a collective team rather than individually.

There will be one world government, but it will be run by the people instead of corporations and special interest groups. Each nation will become a state. The government will be a democracy, and people will understand that for democracy to work, we must each participate.

Government will serve the people, and not control them. Corporations will be a place where we work to earn a living, not living entities that manipulate global policy.

Are you dreaming, Goose?

Yeah, I'm dreaming, sure. But I see hopeful signs each day. I see real progress in ending the War Against Gays, and that's encouraging. I see more people and companies becoming environmentally aware.

But, on the downside, I see a new generation of young people who are apathetic and politically detached. Most of them just wander through life, obsessed with instant gratification and comfort, and totally confused as to why their quality of life isn't as good as their parents'. This is the Nothingness Generation, and I don't think they will be the ones to pull us through. Well, maybe the following generation will get us through.

And, most likely, we'll need a complete economic and civil crash before we wake up and learn that "it's not all about us." We need to learn that it's also about other humans and other creatures.

Maybe, just maybe, one day humans will "get it."

Tea Party Goosonomics

We are in the worst recession since the 1930s and many people are suffering. The thing is, most people don't really understand WHY the economy has fallen apart.

I, the Goose, wish to make a few rambling statements on our current screwed up state of affairs:

Debt
I don't mind paying state taxes because Georgia must balance its budget by law. That means the tax money I give to Uncle Sonny immediately goes back into the economy.

On the other hand, I HATE giving tax money to Uncle Sam because much of this money is NOT going back into the economy. Rather, it is being used to pay interest on debt. The sad thing is that most of this debt is owned by foreigners (can you say "China?"), so the money is being DRAINED from the economy. As our country sinks deeper into debt, less money is going back to benefit Americans. So, our horrible Congress spends more, and the downward spiral continues.

The solution is for the U.S. Congress to immediately pass a balanced budget act, and FAST.

Now, the Tea Partiers want taxes cut, but they never mention what services they want cut in return. If you corner them, they will mumble something like, "cut government waste." Now, that is possibly code words for "reduce services to the poor." But, okay, giving them the benefit of the doubt, let's say we cut government waste. HOWEVER, the problem is that most of our taxes go to transfer payments, that is Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid (40%). For 2009, 4 percent went to TARP, which makes me too foaming mad to talk about, so I won't elaborate on that. And then 23% goes to defense spending, which allows us to engage in endless wars and kill Muslims from drones. Funny that conservative folks tell me that President Obama is a secret Muslim because he sure has killed a lot of them.

But I digress ... the point is that Tea Partiers don't want to cut THEIR OWN benefits, nor do they want to cut their beloved military (after all, they are called Tea Party PATRIOTS), yet these are the areas where most of the money is going.

Immigration
Sorry to keep picking on Tea Partiers today, but Tea Partiers have no problem picking on poor illegal immigrants. They keep screaming something about the illegals "stealing our jobs." Hell, do you really want to pick lettuce all day? The funny thing is that I don't hear conservatives screaming about the millions of our jobs exported overseas. That is another big cash drain on our economy. At least the illegal aliens are putting money BACK into the economy through rent, sales tax, and the purchase of consumables.

Also, I would like to point out that illegal immigration has gone way down since the recession started. So, like most Tea Party issues, this issue is a crock of poop.

I realize that my own theory to the job drain is controversial, but I link it to global overpopulation. Our jobs our going to countries that are overpopulated, which dilutes the labor wage. So, to the Chinese and Indians, hey, I have a plan -- let's all have less babies. This will create a labor shortage, forcing companies to pay us more. It's basic economics, man. And you Indian and Chinese friends will not only get a better wage, but we Americans will get a break, because it will be less profitable for U.S. firms to export our jobs. I'm just sayin' ... you know, just an idea.

Medical Sector
The medical sector of our economy is doing quite well. Regretfully, it is a major drag on our economy. Nearly every American pays a sizable chunk of cash so that they can feel better and live longer. New technologies allow us to live longer, but they are extremely expensive. Plus, as we live longer we are a drain on insurance companies, Medicare, and Medicaid. Thus, once again, we have a horrible, downward spiral. The hard truth is that the longer we live, the more we place a drag on the economy. Oh sure, we're pumping billions into the medical sector, but the young people aren't putting enough money back into the system.

The current U.S. medical system is really designed for revenue and not for health. Face it, the medical institutions do not have a vested interest to get you well and quickly, since sick people bring in major money. The clinics and hospitals can squeeze the insurance companies, and the insurance companies can simply raise premiums.

I really like the Kaiser Permanente model, which is more like a health subscription service rather than insurance. If we have many subscription health programs competing in the open market, they would have a financial interest in keeping you well, so that they could keep their subscriptions low, to make them more efficient.

While I applaud the Democrats for passing the health care bill, which is more than the GOP could have ever done, I regret to say that the legislation is a huge, muddled mess. I believe that an advanced society should provide universal health care for its citizens — we just haven't arrived there yet.

Also, for those who call me a liberal, please sit down because what I am about to say will shock you: I don't think companies should be obligated to provide health care. That is simply a benefit they may offer to attract the best workers. If we had more subscription based health plans, there would be more emphasis on wellness and more affordable care for all. But right now, the health care system is only a step away from organized crime, and they are raking in billions, so any meaningful change to the current system will be difficult.

So, I'm bringing this up, and please forgive me, but the videos I saw of the Tea Partiers in Washington, DC showed that most of them were obese. So, really guys, if you want to help the economy go to the gym.

Energy
Now, here is an economic sector that swims in money. But many experts say that we reached Peak Oil and that supplies will only go down. I can assure you that when our economy cranks up again, we will be hit in the face with a huge increase in energy costs, which will take much steam out of the recovery. We can beat this bullet by taking a few billion from the American war machine and diverting it to green energy research. This will do more for peace than building a few more stealth bombers. We HAVE the technology right now for a green economy, and we just need a little more research to make it viable. Once it is viable, we can start investing in green infrastructure. And at the same time we can create a wonderful green energy industry, and we can export our technology to China so they can start giving America some money, instead of us giving them all of ours. There is a real opportunity in this area, but our incompetent, disoriented, and totally dysfunctional federal government has made little progress in this area.

I know you Tea Partiers don't believe in Global Climate Change, and you probably don't believe in Peak Oil either. But I do know you don't like our reliance on foreign energy sources, and I know that you understand how dysfunctional this makes our foreign relations. I think we can all agree on that. And, shoot, relying on other countries for our energy ain't patriotic (oh right, we'll just drill more).

Social Security
The Tea Partiers love to scream the word "socialism," however all of us our socialists. Let's look at the facts. I can say that myself, and all my friends, are pretty stable people and we could probably create retirement accounts without the government's help. But, I know that many people do not have stable lives, and that's often no fault of their own. Due to a variety of reasons, people may simply not be able to save for retirement their entire lives. So, I don't mind being a socialist a little bit to create a government retirement pool, to ensure that others have social security, even though they've had some trips and falls in life. And I may have a fall tomorrow, so I think Social Security is a smart idea. Should we let people opt out of the system? I'm inclined to say "no" because even the luckiest person in the world can have a complete turnaround tomorrow. Social Security reminds us that we are all in this together.

But, as we pay the billions in medical care to live longer, we are draining the Social Security system. So, folks, I'm afraid we are going to have to work longer and retire later.

Summary
Okay, Tea Partiers, sorry to pick on you today. But your constant hypocrisy sort of keeps me pissed. The point is, all of us are in this ride together, and if we want to survive this mess we have to stop being divisive and delusional, and start working together.

Of course, some won't even acknowledge a problem and others will argue endlessly about what the REAL problem is, and Congress will deadlock as usual. But if we have a higher vision and a sense of unity, maybe we can get over the usual bickering.

Goose here, signing out...

We Can Do Better

Even though I work from home and try to minimize driving, I still feel guilty every time I drive my car. Rather than being part of the solution, I know I'm part of the problem.

I WISH I owned an electric car that was charged nightly with renewable energy. The thing is, we have the technology to do that, and we are close to making it economically feasible. If we could throw just a few billion into research, I'm certain we could make it work. And a few billion dollars is a lot? Well, I understand we spend $1 billion a day in Afghanistan. And, honestly, I think we are making new enemies there as fast as we can kill them.

I WISH we could end the violence in this world. I know that we have the maturity to do it. I find all the violence repulsive -- it just says that we are better dressed cavemen. We've probably come a long way from the Middle Ages, but we have a long ways to go.

I try to have compassion for my fellow humans, the wildlife, and my world, but it's never enough. I try to help others, but I never feel like I'm doing enough. So, the guilt never goes away. I am tormented because I always feel like I should be doing MORE.

As a child I remember watching with fascination the elevator on Star Trek. It started out slow, and soon it was going at full speed, with the lights from each floor whizzing by a little window. That's how I feel my life is going. The trips around the Sun are getting faster and faster. I want to put the life I've been given to good use, and I feel like I'm running out of time.

My employer has downsized and my workload has doubled, so I feel that I'm always living with a pile of bricks on me. Gone are those 37.5 hour work weeks, which I enjoyed for so long, and which allowed me to give a massive amount of energy and time to volunteer work. Now, I'm always drained. I help out when and where I can, but for the most part the life and vitality has been sucked out of me. Every day I go to work I must fight for sheer survival. The recession has been brutal to my employer. I still don't know if we will survive or not. So, everyday I'm hoping for signs of an economic upturn to get the pressure off ME, even though a robust economy will again put the pressure on the environment. As the economy improves, the bulldozers will begin flattening forests again, sending little animals fleeing, with no place to go.

And thus, this is the great irony of my life. When the economy is bad, the environment is given a rest, but there is more pressure on all of us to survive. So, maybe, in effect, this is the one time when I'm really helping the environment. Because I am taking the pain. I am working harder than I've ever worked in my life, and 60-hour work weeks are now the norm. But, it's grinding me down, and I simply don't have the energy to do my share in the fight.

Right now, my activist friends are trying to stop two new proposed coal plants in Georgia. This is a just cause, and I wish I could do more. The Old Guard is used to doing business the way they've always done it, and are resisting hard. The old mode of thinking is that we run our dishwasher, enjoy our curling irons, and heating pads, while coal smoke billows into the air, warms our planet, and alters our entire ecosystem. And each day, hundreds of species are unable to adapt to the rapid change, and become extinct. We kill so that we can be comfortable. It makes no sense.

So, I believe we can do better. We have to end this stupid political partisanship, and we have to find politicians who respond to reason, and we have to team up to find solutions. China, with their one-party system, is getting way ahead of us. Wake up, Americans. WAKE UP!!!

Idealism

I sometimes wonder where I got all this idealism. I wonder why I always like to defend the underdog.

I support gays because the war against them is simply pointless. These good people have been put through hell and treated like second class citizens for no reason at all. The Holy Bible says adulterers should be stoned, but these little finks are the real rats because they betray the trust of their life mate, yet they hardly get a wrist slap. The hypocrisy of the War Against Gays just makes me sick. And don't tell me "hate the sin, love the person." That is simply a thin veil for hating the person. And hate is not a family value.

As for the illegal immigrants, I have ten times more respect for them than any Tea Partier. They came to this country, often at great risk and expense, to get a crappy job. Because, in the United States, at least they wouldn't starve. Many were lured by that American Dream, where, you know, anyone can get rich if they work hard and get lucky. And the corporations welcomed them on because they worked cheap, and you didn't have to pay them health care or vacations. And all the while, the government just went "wink, wink." And then, suddenly, the Tea Party Patriots say ENOUGH! DEPORT THEM! THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW! Too sad.

Most importantly of all, I stand up for nature and wildlife because animals can't defend themselves hardly at all. We have a vice presidential candidate gunning down wolves from a helicopter. Now, how fair a fight is that? We also have millions of Americans who love to pack out restaurants on Sundays after church, but don't really care about the thousands of species that are going extinct every day. Someone has to defend these poor critters. And yes, I know I'm in the minority when I say this, but a opossum has just as much right to be here as some chain smoking, hard drinking, littering, obnoxious human. Just because we have big brains we are ruthlessly arrogant, and for the most part, we are indifferent to our fellow animals.

I know my idealism is vain, but my blood boils when Tea Party creeps scream, "We have to save our country," when, in effect, these right-wing reactionaries are what we need to save the country from. I'll take socialism over fascism any day. And as these folks scream "less government" and throw me in jail for masturbation, all I can say is ORWELLIAN.

By now, cynicism should have smothered out my last fiber of idealism, but I can't stop caring, and I won't stop fighting.

Todd

Who Will Help Me Save the World?

The most difficult part of being an activist is getting people to change their minds. When I first returned to environmentalism in 1997 I had this crazy idea that people would respond to logic and common sense. I also thought people would work together for a common cause.

Boy was I wrong.

I know look at the Tea Party movement with great fascination. This is a group of people totally incapable of seeing their hypocrisy. They debunk global warming and routinely bash immigrants, gays, and Muslims. They want less government, but still want their Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. They want less taxes but also want to lower the deficit, but they really prefer less taxes (and let the next generation pay down the federal debt).

From an article about Tea Party hypocrisy:

They are only concerned with fighting government spending that benefits other people and are desperately seeking to save their own precious benefits. They think the costs are well worth it and they have no intention of shouldering the burden themselves. These costs will be incurred by future generations whose taxes will be higher and whose benefits will be lower or nonexistent.

Point being, I can't expect a Tea Party member to help save the environment. Oh, unless it personally benefits them. The Tea Party Patriots are like the NIMBYs that I regularly deal with (Not In My Backyard). These are the people who don't give a rat's ass about the environment until a developer is clearing the woods behind their home. Then they call the local Sierra Club group and want US to do something about it.

What we need are people willing to work for the common good, but people in general are selfish and do not want THEIR TAX DOLLARS helping a less fortunate person. They rail on about evil abortions, but they have no interest in adopting or helping to support all the welfare babies that an anti-abortion law would create. And they certainly would not support a tax increase to feed the unwanted children that they forced desperate mothers to have.

So, getting back to my point, how can I expect Tea Partiers or all the other selfish, irrational people to work on a common challenge like global warming? Even if there's 1,000 scientists saying that global warming is human-made, all it takes is one community college professor, funded by an ExxonMobile grant, to challenge global warming, and suddenly it's a "debate."

And, the entire idea of being a conservative is resisting change, so it's just better for the frog to die in the slowly boiling water than to jump out. And in fact, an underlying theme of the Tea Party movement is to "make things like they were." So, it's simply easier to deny something than to make a few lifestyle changes.

As I look at the political landscape I see a divided America, and as a result of the division, little is getting done. How can we address the great problems of the world, like depleting oil supplies, global warming, and overpopulation? If I took a survey, I'd say that the majority of Americans will simply deny all three problems. Whether from ignorance of selfishness, it's hard to gauge a person's true motives, but one thing is for sure, and that is they won't be helping the environment.

I mean, my gosh, most people don't even recycle, and that is mind-boggling to me. And there is another large group of people who spend their days sucking smoke into their lungs and flicking their nasty cigarette butts on the ground. I don't expect these people to be on board either. I've met a few environmentalists who smoke, but these folks are in the minority.

So, who will work with me to save the environment? Those liberal professors and teachers? Yes. The Unitarian Universalists, Episcopalians, and Reformed Jews? Yes. The cyclists, hikers, and kayakers? Yes? Overall, the group of people who are passionate about the environment is small. And against us is a massive coalition of people who are ignorant, ambivalent, selfish, indifferent, and apathetic. It is an uphill battle, for sure.

But I do regularly meet people with inquisitive minds who WANT TO KNOW and WANT TO LEARN what this environmental stuff is all about. These are people that I have a special respect for, and these are the individuals who give me hope.